Jane Eyre: Writer's Digest Annotated Classics

Nice book, but I was expecting a lot more annotations.

There are two reviews here, since this special version of the book has two things going on. When I was a kid I had some weird built-in prejudice against anything labeled "classic". Unknowingly I read "Tom Sawyer" and "Huckleberry Finn" and even Shakespeare's "Julius Caesar," but I thought I had "discovered" them--had anyone told me they were classics, I wouldn't have read them. Stupid, but true. When I was in my thirties I read "A Tale of Two Cities" and re-thought my whole position on the classics--maybe there was a reason they were called that. So I read a lot of them, but I never read "Jane Eyre." I saw about four different movie versions of it, though, and figured I knew the story well enough. But when Writer's Digest announced this version, I saw a chance to correct an omission AND get some good writing advice. KM Weiland's book on structure, after all, is a masterpiece. Hence, this double-edged review.1. Jane Eyre. The movie versions I've seen were, surprisingly, fairly true to the book (not often the case, as anyone who reads a book and then watches its movie knows). Shy governess, obnoxious-but-philosophical middle aged guy. Crazy wife in the attic. Missionaries. They hit all the high points. But Bronte's prose is well-done, and her characters are far more complex than the movies. She has a great way of building suspense, too. Even though I knew what was going to happen, I wanted to see it happen, so I kept reading. And I was satisfied when I closed the book: a good story, well-told.2. The notes. Weiland's notes are, at the risk of sounding sycophantic, brilliant. Remember, these notes are about the writing of the book, not about the historicity or any of the other kinds of analysis you'd usually see in annotations. (My annotated "Sense and Sensibility" practically explains each curtsy as well as why dances lasted half an hour.) There's plenty of analysis, but it's all about how Bronte tells the story. For readers of Weiland's "Structuring Your Novel," it's like a Part II, showing the First Plot Point, (p118), Midpoint (p216), Third Plot Point (p325), Resolution and Epilogue. There are even pages at the back with questions (and lines for answering them or writing other notes) about structure. But wait, there's more! There are notes on perspective, voice, POV, conflict and tension, obstacles, character development, transitions, and way more than that. (I'm laundry listing here--but trust me, the notes could practically be their own book.)I'm a writer myself, though you won't see my name in Amazon in that capacity--I ghost write. Under my own name, I'm also a freelance editor (developmental, substantive, and copy--you name it, I do it) and have been one for years. But I still read books on writing all the time. Some I love, some I tolerate, and a few I've ridiculed (after jumping up and down on their tattered remains). But this book is its own category, or perhaps it defies category. It's a writing master class, analyzing a masterpiece of English literature to make its key points. If I were a writing teacher, this would be required reading for my classroom.One thing alone keeps the book from getting the fifth star, and it's a mechanical thing, nothing against Bronte or Weiland. They did their jobs well! But the typeface for the story is a serif font, and it's ten points at most, maybe eight. I needed to buy a +2 set of "cheaters" to read the story alone--and the notes are worse. They're a pale blue sans serif (the contrasting serif/sans serif fonts are good; the size is not and the pale color is not) that was hard to read even with the +2 cheaters. The notes are in the outer margins and take up about a third (one column) of each page. I wish they'd gone for broke and instead of giving us a six-by-nine (I'm eyeballing it, so the measurements are probably not exact), gone up a couple of sizes, just for the sake of those of us who are over 40. Then maybe they could've made the print a decent size.

I have Weiland's other books, "Outlining Your Novel" and "Structuring Your Novel", so when i had the chance to pre-order this, it was like, "Shut up and take my money!" :-) I was not disappointed.It's the unabridged text of Jane Eyre, so you could read the novel and ignore the annotations (but why would you of course!). But it's like having Weiland there with you, telling you how you can apply Bronte's writing genius to your own novel. This is the first annotated anything that I've seen that tells you where Plot Point One, etc. is. My professors can't tell me that. (I've asked!)So this is not annotated like the classics usually are. there is nothing in it about the times in which the author lived, or what a governess of this time period would experience. You already know that, you've read Jane Eyre, probably in school. This is a classic novel with instruction and encouragement on how to create your own classic novel, whatever your novel is about. It's worth the price of admission, even if you are a dude and don't care about Jane Eyre. You could just read the annotations and text examples and learn.I pre-ordered the Dracula one. I can't wait.Now about Jane Eyre. This was the first time I'd read it and I was impressed. It's a classic for a reason. I just have two comments about it:1) I'm pretty sure Mr. Rochester could have gotten an annulment.2) WTF was up with St. John Rivers? I felt that that part was way too long and I wanted to strangle him after he wouldn't take no for an answer the first time he asked her to marry him. I wanted her refusal to be as solid with him as it was with Mr. Rochester. Girl, you deserve so much better! But I digress...

I was thrilled a few weeks ago when KM Weiland asked me to read an advance copy of this annotated version of Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte. I'm rarely disappointed by the classics and had not read this amazing novel. Over the past three years Ms. Weiland's creative works have entertained me and I've learned a great deal from her writers' blog and books on writing craft; Outlining Your Novel: Map Your Way to Success and Structuring Your Novel: Essential Keys for Writing an Outstanding Story.I'm glad I finally read Jane Eyre. Bronte's writing is captivating. It hooked me from the beginning. Ms. Weiland isn't obtrusive in her use of annotations but when she does comment, you can be sure she's addressing important elements in the development of a character arc or plot development. Readers of her prior writing resources will see close parallels to lessons in those resources. In the end you will find excellent practical application of structural points covered in her earlier work. At the end of the novel, I had the pleasure of finding a Study Guide filled with provocative questions about the reader's reactions to content in the story.If you've read KM Weiland's prior writing resources I think you will find this to be a perfect follow up. If you haven't, it's a great place to begin.The print version is available for order. I have mine reserved. Jane Eyre: Writer's Digest Annotated Classics

un romanzo molto bello ed avvicente, che nonostante i suoi anni risulta scritto in un modo molto attuale. I commenti di K. M. Weiland assolutamente utili per chi è interessato ad analizzare lo stile di scrittura di C. Brontee e prendere spunto per un proprio eventuale romanzo/racconto. Un piccolo avviso per chi come me non aveva mai letto il libro, i commenti a lato rivelano parti successive del romanzo (spoiler).Assolutamente consigliato.

Brontë's book is truly a classic: moving portraits of larger-than-life characters, both as regards their physical appearance and their character and behaviour; vivid descriptions of the countryside and the interiors of buildings; and a subtle storyline which keeps the readers in suspense and builds affinity with Jane and Mr. Rochester. K.M. Weiland's notes are very instructive for would-be writers, pointing out some of the structural and artistic features that would otherwise go unnoticed.