America's Constitution: A Biography

"America's Constitution..." is a serious, scholarly book, but so lucidly written that the lay reader will have no problem following the text or comprehending the theme. This book is a major work on the topic and so well done that 5-stars are easily earned. Other books of similar intent, such as Professor Jack Rakove's book Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution, may succeed in analysis, but frequently leave the lay reader with a hard slog for comprehension.Professor Amar blends three perspectives in his look at the constitution: history, law and political science. And that three-viewed approach is what yeilds the depth of penetration that this book presents. The issue of the young nation's "peculiar institution" (slavery) for example, is shown to be infused well beyond what the casual reader might see in reading the constitution.By illustrating the norms and mores of the late 18th century, citing the record of the constitution and ratification papers - both Federalist and Anti-Federalist, as well as analysis of court decisions that have followed - Professor Amar makes his case with clear documentation and solid logical argument for both the good and bad; and there is no mistaking that the "good" triumphs. He tells us what we need to know about our constitution, not what its detractors or its exalters insist on. Highly recommended if a very in-depth look at the U.S. Constitution, its original meanings and historic evolution are your interest.-----kindle edition-----It is always disappointing in a book such as this (one that can be used for reference) that hardcopy page numbers are not provided. References from kindle to hardcopy or the reverse are difficult to impossible. Digital media or not - page numbers are still (unfortunately) the only common denominator. And, if EVER a book needed an index - this is it. Re-finding passages of interest are now left entirely to highlighting which can become overwhelming in a 655 page book - especially one with as much to say as this one, yet NO index is provided. For expediency, the publisher has eliminated the index from the e-book version - but retains the same price as the paper copy! e-Book publication quality, ★★☆☆☆ for typically rapacious Random House.

The U.S. Constitution is a huge subject, and Prof. Amar contributes in this book by keeping a focus on the ideas and debates that led up to or were contemporary with adoption of each of the Constitution's clauses. It touches on virtually every phrase.A reader might come to the book looking for other things that Prof. Amar does not try to provide: in particular, lessons from his analysis of then-contemporary debates that might be useful for now-contemporary debates.For example, on Presidential impeachment, Prof. Amar discusses the phrase "Treason, Bribery, and other high Crimes and Misdemeanors," noting that "high" was not used in the Constitution to describe the standard for impeachment of other officials, and noting that treason and bribery set the standard for what is referred to by the general terms "crimes and misdemeanors," etc. He closes by using Andrew Johnson's acquittal to illustrate. Period, end of story. I mean, what else could a reader from today's generation want to hear about, regarding standards for Presidential impeachment? (Good grief.)In my case, I was interested in what the Founders thought about "enumeration," both in the sense of "census" (which the book does not touch on) and in the sense of enumerated and unenumerated rights. On the latter, Prof. Amar is clear: "While this book has focused on the written and enacted Constitution, I myself do not believe that all of American constitutionalism can be deduced simply from the document. At key points the text itself seems to gesture outward, reminding readers of the importance of unenumerated rights above and beyond textually enumerated ones. Thus we need at least one more book to start where this one ends." And yet this book does touch on the subject, assertively if lightly, in its discussion of "No State shall" under the fourteenth amendment, where the author states that the Supreme Court construes the Constitution as providing a right of privacy. The author also refers us to his previous book on the Bill of Rights.In addition, I was interested in seeing what I could learn about the liberty-empire range of perspectives concerning U.S. colonial history.First, I have to report that the indigenous peoples do not make much of an appearance in the book, the word "indigenous" not at all. While this may accurately reflect the level of interest in indigenous peoples in the Constitution's text and debates, it contrasts mightily with the book's substantial focus on African-Americans, who Prof. Amar notes are mentioned in the Constitution's text not at all.In general, however, Prof. Amar is non-judgmental on empire. The "Territory" section of Chapter 7 on "States and Territories" notes the colonies' "struggle to wrest the [trans-Appalachian] West from England" as part of the independence movement. With respect to the subsequent Constitution, the book notes that "the union was broke," that Federalist Paper No. 38 characterized the West as "a mine of vast wealth," and that "the first wave of income would flow from land sales."However, Prof. Amar's book doesn't mention that Britain also was broke from the expenses of winning France's withdrawal, or the role of the hated taxes in repairing that. The book's frequent references to George Washington's influence on the country's direction do not include mention of his role in conquering western land for commercial sale. The book does however slightly puncture the "no taxation without representation" rationale where it says, "Not that the colonists really wanted direct representation in Parliament. A small number of Americans amid a sea of British legislators would likely be consistently outvoted."Contrasted with the book's adopting as a major theme the expansion of liberty accomplished through the Constitution and its amendments, the near non-treatment of empire places the book towards the right in the political spectrum in that particular regard.While this gap regarding "empire" reflects an interest of my own, in a finite book gaps must necessarily be infinite, so I should close by saying that what is there in the book is substantial and worthwhile.

Before this book, I only had the vaguest ideas about the constitution. To me, it was a document that was important to high school civic teachers and the Supreme Court. In my mind, the constitution was surrounded by a keyword soup with nebulous meanings: Originalism, Textualism, Republic vs. Democracy, Federalists, Confederacy, etc.Well, if you're looking for a book to set everything straight, this is it. America's Constitution: A Biography is a tour of American history that starts with the preamble and ends with the amendments. However, like all good tours, it's about more than just history; it's about context. It's not just about what the document says, how it came to be, or who wrote it; it also explains why.

Blend with political history of US, this marvelous piece of knowledge is immensely beneficial for students who are doing research on comparative constitutional law.

Excellent work!

Good condition

法律の素人でもアメリカに興味ある私には最高に面白い。著者Amar、エール大学教授のMOOC,COUSERAのConstitutional Lawを受講中ですが.楽しい講座です。なお、余談ですがアマゾン日本でCOUSERAの日本でも人気の出そうなコースの主な推薦図書など揃えてもらえませんか？助かります

good!