Binoculars for Adults,High Power HD Professional Binoculars for Hiking Travel Stargazing Bird Watching Hunting with Low Light Night Vision,C-eagleeye 10x50 bincoulars

I hot these because I wanted to see if people at night do mischievous things when I am not there on the platforms where I work.They may not be as strong as I would like but they do work quite well. I took a picture without using them with my phone and with them too. You can see what I see on the difference.I am surprised that the lenses are made out of glass and could be easily scratched. The body of these I can't tell if anything of it is metal but is durable. I belive they will damage if dropped so I put the neck strap on them just incase they slip out of my hands.The things that bugging me is the binoculars need to be inserted in the pouch sideways to fit or they will poke out the top and can't close the flap to hold them.The end caps to protect the lenses fall off quite easily and loose them. I already lost one of the small ones. Other than that I like them alot.I am also surprised how clear they are using them at night too.I think that the cost is pretty reasonable and I hope they last for a long time as long as I take care of them.I hope you grab a set too and have fun with them. Good Luck to all of you and your new binoculars.

502 or three pairs of binoculars in my life from Bushnells to Nikons, and these are a nice pair of binoculars to have in the car, boat or around the house. The case is lightly padded so it’s not gonna save them from damage if you drop them off rocks when you’re on the trail. Think of it more of a dust case than anything else. The front lens covers are attached to the frame so you won’t be losing those, however, the rear lens covers are not attached any soda binoculars you’re gonna lose them and they’re gonna fly off the 50. Well, they do have some weight to them. They aren’t particularly heavy and your arms are gonna get tired and feel like at the same thing for a couple minutes. I had a little strap that came with mine that I cannot figure out what they go to. They are the same quarter inch width as the strap that actually attaches to the binoculars. So I have no idea what that is. The only other bad part is getting that quarter inch strap attached to the next strap through the buckles on the binocular housing. I had to use a pick forceps and screwdriver it’s a really tight fit so but that just took extra couple minutes rather than a couple seconds so no big deal.All in all a nicer of binocular’s for someone to be starting out with and to carry on the trail, but don’t get attached to them as only time will tell if they’re gonna last 20 years.

This is a straight out of the box review based on the listing claims. I am NOT and optics expert, but I think the Seller of these optics owes the marketplace a written explanation on how the 20x magnification rating was derived. Actual performance of 7x to 8x is nowhere near the 20x magnification claimed based on a common understanding of what magnification in scopes and binoculars is.Let's start with an "in the field" understanding of magnification in optics.To put it simply, having optics with four power means the image will appear four times bigger than with a naked eye, while optics with three power only magnify the image three times, One can get much deeper into the topic to arrive at a more finite answer, but I'm not going to do that. I'm also not going to argue whether or not the optics to which these were compared actually performed at their specified magnification ratings. What I can say is that the magnification was on par within the 7x to 8x range those optics manufacturers claimed.I compared these asserted 20x50 binoculars to 4 other optics-- a higher medium quality Asahi Pentax 7x50, inexpensive Tasco 8x30 binoculars, a lower medium quality Bushnell compact binocs 10x25 and finally, a medium higher quality variable Bushnell spotting scope marked from 15x to 40x.The test was to see how well these optics could magnify and read 3 lines of text of 1/4", 7/8" and 9/16" in as sign on a stationary fence post at 83 yards. The sequence of relative magnification in these optics turned out to be pretty close to their asserted magnification and could be ordered as 7x, 8x, 10x and 15x to 20x (the higher magnification capability of the spotting scope was ignored for this comparison). The relative order of magnification was barely discernible between 7x and 8x, but was more noticeable at 10x. The only real difference was the clarity observed because of the relative quality of the optics.The binoculars under review placed in the 7x to 8x slot in relative magnification. In other words, the size of the image I saw and the text I could read through the asserted 20x50s was closer to the image I saw in the 7x and 8x and DID NOT reach the 10x image.The image I saw at the 15x setting for the spotting scope far outclassed all the others and was better again at the 20x setting. My expectation was that these 20x50 binoculars would fit in with this 15x to 20x range in being able the text. It is beyond a stretch to assert these are 20x magnification.On the brighter side, no distortion was obvious and the 20x50s (but really 7x-8x) seemed to have pretty could light transmission, brighter than the Pentax 7x50s, but fell a little short in relative sharpness. They are also much lighter at 823 grams (1.8lbs) vs 1019 grams (2.24 lbs). They come with a thicker carrying strap that should take quite a bit of pressure off of the neck. The objective lens covers stay attached to the binoculars, but the eyepiece covers are completely removed. Diopter adjustment had good range and seemed to have a coarse and vernier adjustment for finer adjustment. Shock protection seems pretty good and they have a nice feel. I would rather carry these in the field than the heavier Asahi Pentax even though the Pentax has a decided edge with image sharpness. Second photo shows Pentax 7x50 on left and the Ceagleeye 20x50 on right.Did I really expect to see 20x magnification for $60? Certainly not, and I don't want to speculate too much on why 20x turns out to be no better than seven or eight, but in my opinion, it's either the wrong item or the wrong spec. Two stars for not measuring even close to 20x.

This is an Amazon Vine review of the C-EagleEye 20x50 binoculars I wasn’t expecting these to be the best pair of binoculars in the world, and they are not, but they’re no bad. Getting the strap connected was kind of a pain, but the strap is actually really nice and comfortable around the neck. The carrying case is pretty basic, nothing too extraordinary or special. There is a second small strap included, though I don’t know why you would use it. The front lens caps are captured to the binoculars so that you won’t lose them, however, curiously, the smaller caps are not and can be lost very easily as they are not a very tight fit. Small problems I guess, maybe just don’t bring the caps when you go bird watching! The focus seems to work pretty well, and the binoculars are quality built for the most part. I’m still searching for the universal smartphone adapter that was mentioned on the Amazon website! Honestly, I don’t know if that was included as a joke or something, there is no special adapter included that connects this in anyway to a smartphone, its just a regular pair of binoculars…maybe I’m missing the joke! All in all, it’s a nice set of binoculars for a decent price that won’t break the bank.

These are only worth overlooking