TP-Link TL-SM5310-T 10GBASE T RJ45 SFP Module SFP to RJ45 10GBase T Copper SFP, Silver

Good but the packaging was not sealed

Works as intended and compatible with TpLink

Works as advertised in a QNAP M3216R-8S8T switch. Had to do a simple reboot after the initial installation, and it's been fine since March of 2024. Unit is on 24/7. Gets close to rated speed and steady transfer of large backup images (30-68GB) on my 10GbE copper network with nvme ssds at each end. Insertion fit is easy, yet snug. Locks easily. Barely warm to the touch, not hot like many other SFP+ modules. Quite pleased with it... will purchase more as the network expands.

I think the market for 10GBase-T is a bit premature. I've tried several vendors of these SFP+ modules and when they work, they work for a short period of time and then dies. This particular device failed after 3 days of operation. When I removed the SFP from its cage, it was very hot and I was seeing several DDM log captures that the SFP was failing. Although interesting for use cases that have Cat6(a) already in place, I suggest avoiding 10GBase-T altogether. At least for now. And for those that are going to attempt to get 10G to their host devices on Cat6(a), these device add a bit of latency. Just sayin..... up to you to try but for me any 10GBase-T I try will be Enterprise grade only going forward. If I even want to revisit this.

In general the sfp+ works great, they are running a bit hot in my switch. My one has a low voltage warning (DDM) after contact tp support any divination of 20milivolt is fine. I am happy .

استخدمتها مع TP-ER7206 خلتني اسخدم ال SFP موديول ... و النتيجة ان السرعة وصلت لأقصى حد إستجابة الراوتر و الكنترولر بقت رهيبة و ال GUI بقى بيفتح على طول بدون اي تأخير السبب ان ال SFP موديول منفصل داخليا في الراوتر عن وحدات ال Rj45 و بالتالي كإني مشغل جهازين منفصلين في جهاز واحد ال Latancy لا يزيد عن 3 ملي ثانية في اقصى تحميل مع STC Fiber 300 ياريتني اشتريتها من زمان والله