The Black Banners Paperback – January 1, 2012

Update December 2016With the election of Donald Trump and the incredible spread of ISIS which now extends from Central Africa to the Chinese border and Stockholm to Indonesia to Manila to Los Angeles to Orlando there's bound to be some major shifts in US policy from the top to the bottom. This book should be on every policymakers and commentators must read list in order to more competently interpret both the threats and the potential strategies and policies.*****************************************************************************This is a must read for every citizen with an interest in this critical subject. Most of us who are interested in the area are subject to the mini specials and talking head babble which imparts no real wisdom or books with a more limited vision. The Black Banners is detailed, visionary and written from the view of someone who really knows the subject but is not trying to defend either himself or some political view.Probably the greatest takeaway is the potential effectiveness of a skilled interrogator working without the "enhanced techniques". The author makes a highly convincing case that skill triumphs over blunt force. I'm also reminded of James Stockdale's writing (In Love and In War) on his years of torture in N Vietnamese prisons. The prisoners came to realize that most anything could be tortured out of them but that the goal was to provide as little as possible in each session and to include some misleading information. Stockdale was also very clear that he would not allow himself to be captured again.The book focuses on the author's participation in many of the investigations and the frustrations of working with the CIA and Whitehouse on many occasions. I think the book fails to cover the many problems within the FBI leading up to 9-11 including he obsession with prosecutions , perhaps at the expense of prevention, the corruption within the FBI where very senior officials were promoted after obstructing investigations and the all too close relationship between the FBI and Clinton whitehouse. The exclusion of these issues from the book appears to be more related to what the author was doing rather than any attempt to cover the events. The memos from field agents pleading for help from HQ to investigate potential terrorist flight training and others asking for assistance in obtaining warrants to search computers document the failures.The first 1/3 of the book is well worth the price of the whole book.If there is a downside it is the heavy hand of the censors and the redacted material. While I chafe at the deletions and such, I appreciate that immense value of what may seem to many to be harmless scraps of information regarding what we knew, how we gather information and how we process information.In retrospect I believe most of us are pained at the emphasis on development of evidence for prosecution rather than collection of intelligence to identify and eliminate threats.The writing is refreshingly clear and focused. Perhaps it reflects the years spent in the preparation of briefing and action memos. The drama comes from the facts presented, not an excess of words.I originally borrowed the book from the Santa Monica library but before I returned it I ordered a copy from Amazon to keep as a reference.Highly recommended

One does not have to get far into this book to realize America owes a great debt of gratitude to Mr. Soufan and his associates at the FBI - and, occassionally, at the CIA. I think the general impression of the "War on Terror" is if only a key member of al-Qaeda could be found who would spill the beans all would be revealed and the network destroyed. Not so as this book demonstrates; penetrating the organization involved a seemingly endless process of reading thousands of documents and viewing endless photographs and from this and subsequent interrogations teasing out a few threads that eventually led to a chain of command. The book starts with the US embassy bombings in Africa and then the Cole incident; while it may now seem obvious that al-Qaeda was behind these operations, at the time this was not the case, and how Soufan and his associates built their case involved tireless work, often in hostile circumstances: Soufan spent quite a bit of time in Yemen where the government and its security aparatus was highly supportive of al-Qaeda for reasons developed in the book, a rather difficult working environment to say the least.Until the invasion of Afgahanistan when a few high level bad guys were snagged, Soufan's group had to deal with lower level operatives who scouted sites, prepared explosives or - prior to an operation - blew themselves up. What is strikng about this group is they are not too bright*; for one reason or another, most often the unquestioning US support of Israel vs the Palestinians, these young men found their way to Afghanisan either during or after the war with Russia, met bin Laden and were captivated by the cause, a lot of which was based on the false premise advanced by OBL that the US was cowardly and wouldn't fight as this appeared to be the case under Reagan with the Lebanese barracks bombing and Black Hawk Down under Clinton. Our invasion of Afghanistan came as rather a shock to the beliefs instilled by OBL, as did the fact he fled along with the leadership elements of al-Qaeda - who were mostly Egyptians, a group that did not sit well with operatives on the ground who were almost universally from other countries, one of the little wedges Soufan used in his interrogations. This lower level human material the FBI had to work with inevitably had three different names (birth name, nomme de guerre, and an al Qaeda nick name) and phony passports, quite easily obtained in Yemen. Just figuring out who these guys were was a mind-bending task; the next step - how to pry information out of them - is where the book is most interesting.*One example: The Cole was the second Navy ship targeted in Yemen. The first (The Sullivans) was to be hit at night with a small craft loaded with explosives. The boat operators discovered their appointed hour coincided with low tide and they couldn't drag the boat into the water. They went home and slept well into the morning the next day, during which time some local kids found the boat and were discovered playing with the explosives packed into the boat.The author's general approach in interrogations was to prove to the captive he already knew all about them, holding out was a waste of everyone's time, so just give it up. Easier said than done and how individual interrogations worked makes most interesting reading, albeit the details get a tad mind numbing at times.Soufan really lays into the CIA (who redacted some large chunks of the book after its contents had been cleared by the FBI), the Bush adminstration, and the military; his is not a blanket condemnation and at times he praises other agencies' work, rather he relates specific instances where he was personally involved with a case and the reader is provided with enough background to decide if his negative appraisals are warranted. I'd say he makes his case(s) very well, the most damning having to do with 9/11. Whilst the details are too lengthy to go into here, repeated requests made over months by Soufan that the CIA monitor an individual and his use of a particular telephone booth in Maylasia were denied. After 9/11 when various agencies decided to become more co-operative, Soufan found out that not only had the CIA watched this individual but had photographs of him using this telephone. Soufan had spent years of work developing this lead and became rather enraged when he found out the CIA had been withholding this information - he actually threw up. Whether 9/11 could have been prevented is up to the reader to decide, but there is plenty of evidence making the case it was quite possible. The list of bone-headed moves by the US government is (unfortunately) rather extensive; perhaps one more: At Gitmo, he had great success with one prisoner after allowing him to talk on the telephone with his wife in Yemen. At a later date he was making good progress with another prisoner who knew about the earlier call permission and he said he would reveal all he knew if he could make a similar call. The base commander at Gitmo said the new policy of enhanced interrogation techniques (ginned up by the likes of Feith, Wolfowitz, Addington, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bush etc) prohibited any calls unless personally cleared by Rumsfeld - who did not grant permission in this instance. One phone call and this prisoner would tell all; no dice. (That torture is almost universally counter productive was highlighted by another story of a suspect who had been rendered and "revealed" the connection between Saddam and al-Qaeda, a total lie, that provided the Bush administration with additional ammo to invade Iraq. Unfortunately, many of those rendered had a habit of "committing suicide" in jails located in strange counties, like Libya, one offing himself with three bullets to the back of his head.)All-in-all, while at times not an easy read (the cast of bad guy characters is seemingly endless) this book provides a unique insight into what it takes to track down and apprehend terrorist types and get them to talk, a grind that takes total dedication and seemignly a photographic memory, for which I take my hat off to Mr. Soufan.

I love the book Black Banners, after checking it out from the library I was so amazed that I instantly decided I needed to own a copy. I find it fascinating, Soufan does a great job portraying the facts as he saw them on the ground at the time. His detail about the factors and history of al-Qaeda provide readers with an in-depth understanding that I have not found in any other book. Black Banners should be a textbook for anyone wishing to study our war on terror or war against al-Qaeda, it is that good. My only problem is that when the book was converted into its digital form some words were lost in the transition between pages, sentences don't make sense and after reading more you feel as if you are missing some information. This occurs only rarely however and does not take away from the purpose or message of the book. Overall, Black Banners is an outstanding book written by a man who has devoted his life to fighting one of the greatest threats our country faces today.

Livre arrivé rapidement et conforme à la description !

purtroppo non riesco a leggerlo.

A great first hand expose of how politics and bureaucracy in high places around the world, looking only at the short term, are the main causes for encouraging the spread of such evil acts.

Alih Soufan was the key FBI Al Quaeda investigator for the US Emabassy attacks in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam, plus the attack on the USS Cole. Of all the books written about the events leading up to the 9/11 attack, this has to to be read.

After I heard Ali Soufan interviewed on the Rachel Maddow show I ordered the book. I was fascinated at the idea that critical info was available to have thwarted on the 9/11 terrorists' plot prior to the attacks. Even though several paragraphs are redacted in the 2010 book, you can still make out a good portion of what was missing. I found it intriguing that the internal bureaucracy, personality conflicts & turf-wars of the plethora of agencies within the US intelligence & criminal communities stalled the marrying of all known information such that terrorist plots could be successfully completed. Whaaaat? you say. Yes, it was all known...but not all on one playing field. The frustration of the author is most evident.Also, revealing how interrogation methods are so successful without torture! Torture is not given much credence, in fact, it's even counter productive.