

🎯 Lock in your squad’s edge with hands-free, long-range clarity!
The WALKER'S Razor Walkie Talkie Attachment is a rugged, voice-activated communication device designed exclusively for Razor RSEM Series shooting muffs. Offering up to 3 miles of range, 22 channels with 99 sub-channels, and hands-free VOX operation, it ensures seamless, clear communication during shooting or outdoor adventures. Powered by included AAA batteries and featuring a windproof microphone, this attachment enhances safety and coordination without compromising comfort.


























| ASIN | B07QFCP93T |
| Batteries | 3 AAA batteries required. (included) |
| Best Sellers Rank | #2,752 in Sports & Outdoors ( See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors ) #9 in Hunting & Shooting Eyewear & Hearing Protection |
| Color | Black |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 4.6 out of 5 stars (5,596) |
| Date First Available | April 5, 2019 |
| Department | unisex-adult |
| Item Weight | 6.7 ounces |
| Item model number | GWP-RZRWT |
| Manufacturer | GSM LLC |
| Other display features | Apparel |
| Product Dimensions | 10 x 10 x 5 inches |
| Special features | Water resistant |
| Whats in the box | See Description |
B**B
Hands-Free Communication in the Field
Bought on a Prime Day deal and just received these today. I did a short test with a traditional FRS walkie talkie. On my side, connected to my Walker’s Razor muffs, the sound quality was amazing! I tried the VOX(voice activated) on the low and high sensitivity settings and it worked best for me on the low sensitivity setting. I swapped with my daughter and tested the other way to get a gauge on the sound quality overall and it was par for the course on the FRS walkie talkie side. They are easy to use with VOX, and easy to install. I bought a set each for two of my sons for us to use while target practicing and hunting. I feel that from headset to headset these will be awesome! I cannot comment on battery life yet because these are for Christmas gifts. They do include three AAA batteries! I feel these were a good value for the price. They do not add much weight to my muffs and do not create any discomfort. I highly recommend. If I encounter any issues I will update my review.
B**N
Capable product but get the Bluetooth version for best value.
This product is awesome, BUT.....I wish I had found the bluetooth version first. It's about half the price of the bluetooth version but works well nonetheless. I bought two of these and they are easy to use. It's a GOOD value for the money, and has adequate range and clarity. I haven't used them enough to comment on the battery life just yet, I will probably swap the included batteries for rechargeable ones when they die. It has a tight fit to the Razor slim earmuffs and gets the job done.
G**I
Phenomenal.
I got one for myself and one for my brother, as I'm also now going to order one for my nephew's Razor slims! Very seriously an absolutely amazingly functioning piece of equipment. I work 3 jobs occasionally but my 2 primary ways to generate inkm
T**D
Great solution.
This is a review of two related items: ~ Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Muff (RSEM) light teal color (ASIN: B076HG138S; item model number: GWP-RSEM-LTL; price on 2025/05/23: $32.79; price 2025/05/30: $46.46) ~ Walker's Walkie Talkie (WT) attachment (ASIN: B07QFCP93T; item model number: GWP-RZRWT; price on 2015/05/23: $26.20; price today: $28.99 down from $49.99) I've used the Howard Leight Impact Sport (HLIS) electronic earmuffs for years, so some portion of this review will be in comparison to the HL. The Walker's RSEM is very similar to HLIS in design and in function. The headband, the muffs, and the general construction is very similar as if they copied each other's design. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has a Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) of low to mid 20s. For hearing protection while shooting, I don't consider 20 dB of reduction to be adequate, and I usually wear NRR 30 disposable foam earplugs under the muffs. Because the amplified electronic earmuff volume can be turned up, NRR 30 earplugs would be fine to wear underneath. In a traditional non-electronic earmuff, wearing foam ear plugs underneath maybe too much attenuation if you want to have a conversation with someone. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has a slim design. Collapsed, they are moderately compact, and do not take up a lot of space in the shooting bag. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has an auxiliary headphone jack, so you can plug in an audio plug to listen to music, or use this jack to plug in a two way radio attachment. Walker's makes the WT attachment which is affordable and easy to use. Meanwhile, I'm not able to easily find a simple solution for the lay shooter using the HLIS. There is no active noise cancellation, however, I could say this offers active noise reduction with passive noise isolation; noise isolation from the ear muffs, and noise reduction from the microcircuit that selectively amplifies ambient noise except for loud noises. The RSEM comes in many colors and designs, and while they retail for $79.99 on Amazon, some can be found on sale for around $32. It's hard to find them all and compare prices on Amazon because they're not all on the same Amazon page. Currently, it looks like the Razor Tacti-Grip Slim Electronic muff (ASIN: B08LXS9B9M; item model number: GWP-RSEMRH) is the least expensive at $34.45. The Howard Leight does offer some color and design options, but far fewer than Walker's does. These retail for $90 to $110 on Amazon, and some can be found as low as $60. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) is not that comfortable to wear, but it's tolerable for a few hours. They can be worn over a baseball cap. They won't fit very well over a normal thickness beanie. Now, onto the Walker's WT attachment. This is thing that sets the RSEM apart from the HLIS. This attachment is affordable, easy to install, easy to use, and requires no other equipment. (In contrast, I did come across two way radio adapters that turn a handheld radio and the HLIS into a communication device, but that's not quite affordable or easy to use.) After I installed three AAA batteries into the WT attachment, I attached it to the RSEM. The instructions didn't mention removing the rubber cap to the headphone jack, but I felt this was necessary for a good fit. I was initially unable to hear any received transmission. After a few moments, I found that this was because the WT attachment didn't fit onto the muff very well, and the plug wasn't fully seated into the jack. With some force, I was able to mate the WT attachment to the RSEM, and was able to hear received transmission. The mic seems a little short, but it picks up well even with VOX. There is a bit of delay from the time I start speaking until VOX activates. If you're familiar with two-way radio operation especially on a related frequency, you would know that you have to give it about a second after you key the mic to start taking, else you cut yourself off: it's almost like that. On the WT attachment, I don't think it's that it won't start transmitting, but I think the issue is the VOX activation is not fast enough. The solution is to talk like an airline pilot. "Uhhhhhhhh, this is your captain speaking...." The only adjustments to the VOX sensitivity is "HI" or "LO," so fine tuning may be necessary to talk louder or softer, or adjust the microphone placement away or closer to the mouth. I wish it had infinite sensitivity adjustment using a dial, and I wish it worked better. Being able to use the full list of 22 FRS frequencies is nice, unlike cheap walkie talkies that only offer 10 or so. The priority channel feature is nice and could come in handy at a large event when users are on different frequencies: this is basically a scan feature. The audio quality is OK, but this is a $50 toy radio, I guess. The 99 sub channels are not really sub channels, but by using CTCSS, transmission from radios not using the same CTCSS is not heard on the handset. Wikipedia has a good explanation: "CTCSS tone codes are sometimes referred to as sub-channels, but this is a misnomer because no additional radio channels are created. All users with different CTCSS tones on the same channel are still transmitting on the identical radio frequency, and their transmissions interfere with each other; however; the interference is masked under most conditions. Although it provides some protection against interference, CTCSS does not offer any security against interception or jamming, and receivers without CTCSS enabled will still hear all traffic." Being an FRS radio, if you use this in a busy area, you may unfortunately have to hunt for an open frequency. My only concern with the WT attachment is wether the WT attachment would stay properly mated to the RSEM during movements. I can pull on the bottom of the WT attachment and partially unplug it moderately easily even with the top clamp on. It may be that the plastic moulding of the RSEM or WT attachment is inconsistent, and some reshaping or modification is needed. I'll continue to monitor, and see if I can identify an easy solution. Overall, this is a great solution for on the shooting range.
L**M
Great tool out in the field
GAME CHANGER. Being able to talk to whoever from a distance out shooting or hunting is sooooo nice use these for hog hunting and just out shooting. They fit great on the razor headset great range good quality more than enough volume and super easy to set up and use
V**G
The Solution!
This is the revolution! Quality shooting coms for the rest of us! Affordable, easy to install, clear voice articulation. Great for unit or new shooter training. The answer to decades of com problems on the range! Great job Walker’s!
P**8
Great upgrade for Walker Razors
Works great, it could sound clearer, but I recommend this for people that are going to be 20+ yards away from each other that want to hear each other speak.
A**N
Good sound quality
Great attachment for headset when shooting
Trustpilot
3 weeks ago
1 month ago